Sunday, February 28, 2010
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Avatar Gameswhere You Can Get Pregnant Online
This was going to make next week, but I got a good laugh today the same thing happened again, except this time it did not follow his will, ( Ivonne, Ernesto behaved well this was done tieeeempo) I think
with the tablet I'm saving a little time, and as I practice more defined lines go, let's see if I can keep pace. Lack
little for the anniversary of the blog so soon there will be a contest for twitter (@ jessitsoi) and leave comments on entries so outstanding:)
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Use Creative Webcam Nx Pro With Windows 7
tequevivencias tequevivencias 18 17 tequevivencias
Uff, I think one of the best I've played games on the Wii is Super Mario Bros Wii ... Vanessa and I are hooked, we finished the game but we have erased the progress and start again, this time taking all the coins and stars and secret entrances to find (we call greedy mode) ... The game is collaboration and teamwork, where you have to make sacrifices so there must always be ready to make a Vane;) 
Uff, I think one of the best I've played games on the Wii is Super Mario Bros Wii ... Vanessa and I are hooked, we finished the game but we have erased the progress and start again, this time taking all the coins and stars and secret entrances to find (we call greedy mode) ... The game is collaboration and teamwork, where you have to make sacrifices so there must always be ready to make a Vane;) Saturday, February 20, 2010
Mysore Mallige Online Movie
Yesterday twitter is somehow created in the conversation tequevivencias night, some friends (whether so graduates are not my students) recalled some funny and strange moments we spent in college, each with 140 characters that Twitter allows wrote his tequevivencia. That moved me greatly and that they may see as strange I dedicate this special tequevivencia (K) 
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Lump On A Dogs Breast Bone
tequevivencias 16 15 14
A quiet day, a casual chat. Designers are people individually normal and friendly, until we got together and started to speak in diseñístico. That's why there are so many jokes about our profession. In our particular case, we are geeks (at least ... Angelica Ernesto and I have been too much with us) and we love our profession, so conversations like this are often part of everyday life.
A special feature this tequevivencia, is the fact that they made 100% to the pen tablet computer. Previously it was all in pencil, then ink and then mount PS. But today I decided to take the challenge of beating one of the tablet, so that maybe the lines are not well defined. Little by little I'll be practicing and may encourage me to post more often;) 
A quiet day, a casual chat. Designers are people individually normal and friendly, until we got together and started to speak in diseñístico. That's why there are so many jokes about our profession. In our particular case, we are geeks (at least ... Angelica Ernesto and I have been too much with us) and we love our profession, so conversations like this are often part of everyday life. A special feature this tequevivencia, is the fact that they made 100% to the pen tablet computer. Previously it was all in pencil, then ink and then mount PS. But today I decided to take the challenge of beating one of the tablet, so that maybe the lines are not well defined. Little by little I'll be practicing and may encourage me to post more often;)
Whats The Number To Movieplex59
The "evolution" of instant messaging ... Eye
The first instant messaging systems that existed from the late '60s, early '70s.
The old Unixes had a tool (which would later be implemented by a student at the University of Washington, recognized and popularized under the name "talk" and in fact, still exists and operates just like in those days) that allowed to establish conversations real time between users of the same system or different systems remotely.
Today, half a century later, instant messaging is still valid, although the systems and software used to transmit the messages have changed somewhat. The simple fact you can send plain text in those days, even the "winks" and 3D animation transmitted through MSN Messenger, many things have happened ...
now weighs 66.5 megabytes, and optionally other programs comes with accessories (Which take up as many extra megabytes) of questionable value, and come to be part of a larger package called "Windows Live Essentials, which is Microsoft's response to the lack of Windows software, which makes some users continue turning to the Apple, which bring more profit and basic software which brings the popular base operating system ...
understand that the program does much more now, but do not forget that we speak of an instant messaging program
... something that should be simple and should take a fraction of what fills this monster multifaceted.
By way of comparison, we say that if we use a Jabber client for Windows, downloadable free and also free from the Internet, such as Pandion (1.7 megabytes), theoretically we can do the same, or at least as important that MSN Messenger does, which is to transmit text, space for a fraction of the latter point, and safer.
In essence, instant messaging programs are just that ... programs that send text from one computer to another in real time. Someone knows why "is complicated and grew exponentially as something that originally was so simple? ...
The first instant messaging systems that existed from the late '60s, early '70s.
The old Unixes had a tool (which would later be implemented by a student at the University of Washington, recognized and popularized under the name "talk" and in fact, still exists and operates just like in those days) that allowed to establish conversations real time between users of the same system or different systems remotely.
Today, half a century later, instant messaging is still valid, although the systems and software used to transmit the messages have changed somewhat. The simple fact you can send plain text in those days, even the "winks" and 3D animation transmitted through MSN Messenger, many things have happened ...
Most surprising is the size of messaging programs. 
This afternoon I had to update an MSN Messenger and I noticed a rather bizarre that program, which originally only broadcast text, now weighs 66.5 megabytes, and optionally other programs comes with accessories (Which take up as many extra megabytes) of questionable value, and come to be part of a larger package called "Windows Live Essentials, which is Microsoft's response to the lack of Windows software, which makes some users continue turning to the Apple, which bring more profit and basic software which brings the popular base operating system ...
understand that the program does much more now, but do not forget that we speak of an instant messaging program
... something that should be simple and should take a fraction of what fills this monster multifaceted.
By way of comparison, we say that if we use a Jabber client for Windows, downloadable free and also free from the Internet, such as Pandion (1.7 megabytes), theoretically we can do the same, or at least as important that MSN Messenger does, which is to transmit text, space for a fraction of the latter point, and safer.
In essence, instant messaging programs are just that ... programs that send text from one computer to another in real time. Someone knows why "is complicated and grew exponentially as something that originally was so simple? ...
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
How To Identify Fake Mcm Purse
with compiling, turnip.
Sometimes you do silly things and complicate it simple things ... This is the story of how complicated something that should have worked well from the beginning, simply because the wrong version of a software tool (and how they finally found the error.)
In one of our products (mail server), I use a content management system based on a modified version of simscan.
Last Friday I was trying to compile the latest version (1.4.0) with some modifications to address implementation details when referring to the ClamAV antivirus (basically, the problem arises from the asset at the time umask that creates simscan working directory where you will attachments stored for processing), so I applied the changes and tried to compile. The final product seemed to be perfectly fine, so it was installed and was "working."
mail server 451 Temporarily Rejected message (# 4.3.0)
I tried to find the error in the source code for QMail (using grep) to determine what was causing it, and so I got the file
qmail.c
, where I found that the line was consistent with the error code number 71:
In linux, error codes are defined in the file / usr / include / sysexits.h the kernel headers, so as I do not remember exactly what was for, I looked at the source code, leading to the line containing the explanation of the error: # define
EX_OSERR 71 / * system error (eg, can not fork) * /
Apparently, QMail could not start an instance of "something" that is invoked when the message is going to happen to the queue for further processing, so obviously the problem would be in the management program of the tail. There are only two options here, or use the original program management QMail queue qmail-queue
, or invoke the program that handles contained checks, and that's the simscan
about the service (basically capture the output and error messages of all the programs involved in the transaction and stored in the log for later analysis), and so could see what was exactly the same records. And then the error became apparent: @ 400000004b6c75a6291a77f4 simscan: error ripmime @ 400000004b6c75a6291a7bdc simscan: exit error code: 71
400000004b6c75a6291ca2a4 @ 10303> 451 mail server Temporarily Rejected message (# 4.3.0)
Apparently, was a failed ripmime ... rare thing, because I had never problem. Simscan ripmime used to extract the attachments from messages and then pass the antivirus and antispam to each one separately. I decided to check the ripmime and everything seemed right. The ripmime could be called without problems from the command line. I try to verify that he did his job and everything worked fine, disorienting more every time. I checked the code that instantiates the ripmime in the simscan source, and finally I found this line:
/ * fork ripmime * /
switch (pid = vfork ()) {
case -1: return (-1) ;
case 0:
close (1);
close (2);
I checked it and realized that the version of ripmime he was using was 1.3.0.9, so I looked again more calmly, and found the latest available version 1.4.0.9. This version DOES have the above argument, and the invocation of ripmime with this parameter works. He had missed the download version for digit.
simply, the error was ripmime New versions of old, who had no simscan the argument was wrong when invoked.
happy ending, but after a while of "entertaining" debugging ...
The moral?: Double check that you turn down to compile. Security had been told you so, but it does not hurt to remember from time to time ...
Happy hacking!
Sometimes you do silly things and complicate it simple things ... This is the story of how complicated something that should have worked well from the beginning, simply because the wrong version of a software tool (and how they finally found the error.)
In one of our products (mail server), I use a content management system based on a modified version of simscan.
Last Friday I was trying to compile the latest version (1.4.0) with some modifications to address implementation details when referring to the ClamAV antivirus (basically, the problem arises from the asset at the time umask that creates simscan working directory where you will attachments stored for processing), so I applied the changes and tried to compile. The final product seemed to be perfectly fine, so it was installed and was "working."
consequential In tests, I noticed that the SMTP service failed miserably. When trying to send any message through the new server, an error appeared in the mail program, but the error did not appear as intended, but only appeared a transmission error (mail client fucking stinky ...). 
I put a snapshot of traffic on the server, and when I tried to send a message I could see the error message sent to the server client (the client does not show me ...): mail server 451 Temporarily Rejected message (# 4.3.0)
I tried to find the error in the source code for QMail (using grep) to determine what was causing it, and so I got the file
qmail.c
, where I found that the line was consistent with the error code number 71:
switch (exitcode) {case 71
[...] : return "server Zmail Temporarily Rejected message (# 4.3.0)"; In linux, error codes are defined in the file / usr / include / sysexits.h the kernel headers, so as I do not remember exactly what was for, I looked at the source code, leading to the line containing the explanation of the error: # define
EX_OSERR 71 / * system error (eg, can not fork) * /
Apparently, QMail could not start an instance of "something" that is invoked when the message is going to happen to the queue for further processing, so obviously the problem would be in the management program of the tail. There are only two options here, or use the original program management QMail queue qmail-queue
, or invoke the program that handles contained checks, and that's the simscan
.
anyway as I did not know why it failed, activate a recordio about the service (basically capture the output and error messages of all the programs involved in the transaction and stored in the log for later analysis), and so could see what was exactly the same records. And then the error became apparent: @ 400000004b6c75a6291a77f4 simscan: error ripmime @ 400000004b6c75a6291a7bdc simscan: exit error code: 71
400000004b6c75a6291ca2a4 @ 10303> 451 mail server Temporarily Rejected message (# 4.3.0)
Apparently, was a failed ripmime ... rare thing, because I had never problem. Simscan ripmime used to extract the attachments from messages and then pass the antivirus and antispam to each one separately. I decided to check the ripmime and everything seemed right. The ripmime could be called without problems from the command line. I try to verify that he did his job and everything worked fine, disorienting more every time. I checked the code that instantiates the ripmime in the simscan source, and finally I found this line:
/ * fork ripmime * /
switch (pid = vfork ()) {
case -1:
case 0:
close (1);
close (2);
execl (RIPMIME, "ripmime", "- disable-qmail-bounce"
"-i" message_name, "-d" NULL);
_exit (-1);}
I was struck by the argument passed to ripmime at the fork, - disable-qmail-bounce , and he did not recall seeing him in support of it, so I checked the source of ripmime well and I realized that this argument did not exist in the version I was using (!)...
comment on the argument in the invocation of ripmime, recompile simscan, I installed it and when I tried send the e-mail, everything worked perfectly!
There the problem became obvious last.
"-i" message_name, "-d" NULL);
_exit (-1);}
I was struck by the argument passed to ripmime at the fork, - disable-qmail-bounce , and he did not recall seeing him in support of it, so I checked the source of ripmime well and I realized that this argument did not exist in the version I was using (!)...
comment on the argument in the invocation of ripmime, recompile simscan, I installed it and when I tried send the e-mail, everything worked perfectly!
There the problem became obvious last.
I checked it and realized that the version of ripmime he was using was 1.3.0.9, so I looked again more calmly, and found the latest available version 1.4.0.9. This version DOES have the above argument, and the invocation of ripmime with this parameter works. He had missed the download version for digit.
simply, the error was ripmime New versions of old, who had no simscan the argument was wrong when invoked.
happy ending, but after a while of "entertaining" debugging ...
The moral?: Double check that you turn down to compile. Security had been told you so, but it does not hurt to remember from time to time ...
Happy hacking!
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Pokemon Sliver Online
Armatix: Biometric Security for weapons (?)
Armatix is the name of a company that produces mechano-electronic elements for gun safety. Basically, these people developed a system consisting of a radio receiver installed in a gun and a radio wave transmitter built into a watch. The idea behind this is that the gun fired, the clock must be within approximately 20 inches of it, but the gun stays locked.
The method seems interesting, but the question many things about the same ...
For example, what if in the middle of the night a thief entered the house of the owner of one of these weapons, and of those coincidences of life, the clock fell off the bedside table ...?
Will you have to use the 24-hour clock for the system to be effective? If you break the watch what you do? Being
plastic (apparently quite ordinary) What happens if a burglar comes in and starts the clock on the hand or gives you a good shot with a blunt object to break it?
In middle of the night, trying to target an attacker will not bother you in the light of an LED light green (or red) huge on the back of the weapon, making you vulnerable to let you also fully lit at a time when probably want to stay hidden in the dark, and probably giving the attacker an advantage to know that if the light is red, of course you do not have the watch and the gun will not fire?
If you break the clock, did you take to a retailer or a dealer?
signal emitted by the clock, will it be encrypted or just be an ordinary signal, easily reproducible through transmission equipment standard radio waves?
What if someone designed a device capable of emitting a signal on the same radio frequency clock, either to clear your weapon, or to activate it in the hands of someone who does not have the clock?
I really do not think this system is too Underway ... except for collectors who want to have "a rare and super modern" in his collection. For others, I think that this is not really practical, like other methods that promote
Armatrix
("Mr. Raider, wait I'll try to remember the PIN security device that locks my gun ..."). Gaston Glock
patented a similar system ("System for activating a weapon with an identification Mechanism" USPA 20030070343)
in 2003, but until now there has been any Glock with that system ... Could it be that it was the same questions and realized that the system was not really practical? ... I really do not know, but I let me just with a standard pistol, lest they pass me like poor Wikus Van De Merwe (
District 9) if science advances enough to attach the arms to DNA carriers ...
Salutti! Maybe
Armatix is the name of a company that produces mechano-electronic elements for gun safety. Basically, these people developed a system consisting of a radio receiver installed in a gun and a radio wave transmitter built into a watch. The idea behind this is that the gun fired, the clock must be within approximately 20 inches of it, but the gun stays locked.
For example, what if in the middle of the night a thief entered the house of the owner of one of these weapons, and of those coincidences of life, the clock fell off the bedside table ...?
Will you have to use the 24-hour clock for the system to be effective? If you break the watch what you do? Being
plastic (apparently quite ordinary) What happens if a burglar comes in and starts the clock on the hand or gives you a good shot with a blunt object to break it? In middle of the night, trying to target an attacker will not bother you in the light of an LED light green (or red) huge on the back of the weapon, making you vulnerable to let you also fully lit at a time when probably want to stay hidden in the dark, and probably giving the attacker an advantage to know that if the light is red, of course you do not have the watch and the gun will not fire?
If you break the clock, did you take to a retailer or a dealer?
signal emitted by the clock, will it be encrypted or just be an ordinary signal, easily reproducible through transmission equipment standard radio waves?
What if someone designed a device capable of emitting a signal on the same radio frequency clock, either to clear your weapon, or to activate it in the hands of someone who does not have the clock?
I really do not think this system is too Underway ... except for collectors who want to have "a rare and super modern" in his collection. For others, I think that this is not really practical, like other methods that promote
Armatrix
("Mr. Raider, wait I'll try to remember the PIN security device that locks my gun ..."). Gaston Glock
patented a similar system ("System for activating a weapon with an identification Mechanism" USPA 20030070343)
in 2003, but until now there has been any Glock with that system ... Could it be that it was the same questions and realized that the system was not really practical? ... I really do not know, but I let me just with a standard pistol, lest they pass me like poor Wikus Van De Merwe ( District 9) if science advances enough to attach the arms to DNA carriers ...
Salutti! Maybe
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Customize Your Own Football Visor
GExperts: If Google knows, they also
register the term, before anyone rob me ... A "GExpert" is a user whose knowledge comes almost exclusively from what you get in a Google search.
Until relatively recently, I had an employee like that. The guy was very skilled in using the form, so I would quickly find an answer to almost everything. Once I was chatting with him about the possibility of changing the VPN software I used (working with IPSEC / ISAKMP) for another non-standard, I asked if that other software problems did not assign the MTU of the packets to encapsulate (for the issue of fragmentation), to which, after a reasonable pause, he replied that he did not believe there was problem. What he did not know was that I was running a capture of network traffic where he was working and I saw that was used to break prudential (or should I say, "caused by") do a search in Google on the term "MTU "something that gave me the pattern that he obviously not only cleverly abusing Google for any event outside of their wisdom, but his" solid knowledge of TCP / IP and networks "were not as solid as could be read in curriculum ...
there and almost thinks for us.
perhaps did not find the answer to the last question
... but almost always has something to offer to users who visit, like the ancient Greek oracles.
Not custom made them get answers to everything in Google. No are always correct (in fact, the relationship between correct and incorrect answers appears to be 1:3), and the ever-changing nature of the Internet makes it increasingly difficult to find things useful, truthful and reliable. Practice memory and not so dependent on Google. Imagine that you are using BING, and surely that they will desire to find things online ... : wq
said
register the term, before anyone rob me ... A "GExpert" is a user whose knowledge comes almost exclusively from what you get in a Google search.
Until relatively recently, I had an employee like that. The guy was very skilled in using the form, so I would quickly find an answer to almost everything. Once I was chatting with him about the possibility of changing the VPN software I used (working with IPSEC / ISAKMP) for another non-standard, I asked if that other software problems did not assign the MTU of the packets to encapsulate (for the issue of fragmentation), to which, after a reasonable pause, he replied that he did not believe there was problem. What he did not know was that I was running a capture of network traffic where he was working and I saw that was used to break prudential (or should I say, "caused by") do a search in Google on the term "MTU "something that gave me the pattern that he obviously not only cleverly abusing Google for any event outside of their wisdom, but his" solid knowledge of TCP / IP and networks "were not as solid as could be read in curriculum ...
Finally, the important thing is that increasingly gives the users (technical and nontechnical) depend on Google for almost any everything they do on the internet. With the advent of services like Google Docs, Google Chrome, Google Maps, Google Earth and the acquisitions of Blogger, YouTube and Picasa, it seems that things only got worse. Somehow, the "big G" used to the consultants to obtain answers and solutions to all without having to think or sweat too much, and that will eventually probably be negative for those who abuse their use. Do not forget that everything lives in a "cloud" ... A cloud can suddenly disappear, and with it everything that we trusted. Internet 
A have been attributed various ills of our time, (I suppose that the proliferation of pornography is one of them, though not quite understand what is the problem actually ...), but one that I do not think it is still attributed to lazy to users. Just as the "idiot box" of the '60s brought us forced autism viewers, the Internet brought about the laziness of those who will not learn anything new, because everything is just across from a simple Google search. .. Multivac there and almost thinks for us.
perhaps did not find the answer to the last question
... but almost always has something to offer to users who visit, like the ancient Greek oracles.
Not custom made them get answers to everything in Google. No are always correct (in fact, the relationship between correct and incorrect answers appears to be 1:3), and the ever-changing nature of the Internet makes it increasingly difficult to find things useful, truthful and reliable. Practice memory and not so dependent on Google. Imagine that you are using BING, and surely that they will desire to find things online ... : wq
said
Monday, February 1, 2010
Gay Cruising In Mobile Al
Tequevivencias without words just can say: the awkwardness has no name ... after that clean it again that most touches. The air conditioner leaking but we are now pending before another flood happens again ... Double flood in my case;)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)