Juarez Chih., Mexico - Today is: November 30, 2006
Citizen Agenda: Fox, Machiavelli and deception
November 30, 2006
Updated: 3: 52:30 AM Juarez when
political analyst Lorenzo Meyer
-Trial Federal District .- At the end, the party in power and is different but not the spirit nor the dominant project. In the end, it became clear that the priority of the government of Vicente Fox was to consolidate the dominance of the ideological right, not democracy.
Eight days after end of his term, Fox said confident that he hoped "the implacable view of history." However, this view does not exist, so there are a variety of judgments made by observers and scholars, a plurality of opinions about him, his government and its historical role. In such expressions will start sharply controversial in nature, contradictory and tense, a natural reflection of administrative disorder, the great confrontation of the acute political and social divide that has left Guanajuato at the end of its mandate. Even when the observer should be guided by objectivity, unfortunately, the study of social phenomena full objectivity is not possible, and less when it is so close to the events in time and space.
Perspective .- Fox and his work can be audited from multiple angles: personal, economic, administrative, legal, social, cultural, political, and so on. The attempt here is political will and sense proposed by Otto von Bismarck in 1867, defining politics as "the art of the possible." From this perspective, the president was not bound to the impossible, but to make every effort to reach as far as possible, as promised: to consolidate hard-won democracy. Instead of spending the bulk of its energy to this purpose, she has employed to prevent, at any cost , that the 2006 election opened the door of alternating left.
The historical juncture .- With the election of Mexican society did Fox not only a change of government but of political regime, because to end the monopoly of 71 years of PRI for the presidency, a transformation in the old rules governing the acquisition, exercise and loss of political power. Mexico moved from authoritarian to a pluralistic and democratic supposedly. The origins of this change was the combination of changes in the global environment-the end of the Cold War and the emergence of anti most of the "third wave of democracy" - structural changes in Mexican society, urbanization, education, access to information, increasing rejection of the abuses of the authoritarian PRI, etc .--, the effort of a number of collective and individual actors, the neopanism, the neocardenismo and neozapatismo , among others - and finally, the role of Fox as the leader of the opposition conservative but full of optimism, energy ... and simplicity.
The deceptive simplicity .- The former manager of Coca Cola become presidential candidate, led a wave of electoral insurgency with a strategy different from the immediately preceding "the 1988 - and very consistent with their experience and training in the art of marketing. Fox sold himself and the process of change as the easy answer to a difficult problem.
Much of the Mexican company bought the idea that if regime change was done by the right, the process would be simple, fast and secure. As a candidate, the Guanajuato project the image of the leader decided that no problems would take the PRI from Los Pinos without touching a hair of political or economic stability. A non-PRI president and "entrepreneurs for entrepreneurs" secure personal honesty, transparency of management, freedom of expression, economic growth, employment, war, corruption, real justice, new deal with the United States, improvements in the distribution of wealth, low poverty, speedy settlement of the conflict in Chiapas, effectively combat drug trafficking and other organized crime, would impose a high ecological deterioration and many positive things more.
Machiavelli .- For nearly five centuries Machiavelli made it clear that in politics there was nothing more difficult to achieve the entrenchment of a new regime. That company was always a high degree of difficulty because they have against all those displaced by the change but also to much of the original partners, dissatisfied at not receiving what they expected. Just why the new ruling also needed a new ethic. For Florence, at this juncture the target-stabilize the whole system - justified the means. And the latter were all condemned by the moral behavior but effective Christian in politics: lies, deceit, corruption, injustice, abuse of power and violence, then what in the city were flaws in the ruling that headed a new regime were virtues.
In the beginning, Fox seemed to be anything but a reader of Machiavelli. But someone had to convince him to ensure that change will continue for the right Mexican, he and his people should hear the advice of the great theoretical Renaissance. For an observer with common sense was clear that the simplicity of their "marketing" led to an incorrect analysis of a complex reality, but finally the promised change was never made to begin with because they never tried. The goal was not only a change but much more limited objective: to make the right ideological shift to the right PRI. And that if they succeeded.
The great promise of the Fox administration policy was to devote all its efforts to consolidate the newly gained democracy. To achieve this would be actually willing to drive in 2006 a campaign dominated by the democratic spirit and respect the verdict effective the polls, even if that meant ceding power to the opposition.
However, very early in the six years it became evident that the real effort by Los Pinos was directed less to deepen and consolidate change and more to build the presidential candidacy of the president's wife, ie to achieve the extension of his personal power beyond the administration. To carry out its efforts, built a political alliance with one of the most important forces of non-change: Elba Esther Gordillo and large corporate machine, the SNTE.
The president decided to concentrate what was no power to demolish the old vested interests but the candidacy of the left: that of Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO). And it chose a path obviously cheating but apparently convincing in its outcome: to negotiate with the PRI AMLO outrage in Congress to override his candidacy and not have to confront at the polls. The formal reason for this action to be derided, allegedly failing to stop in time building a road to convey a hospital - did not matter to Fox or anti-democratic coalition had already armed to defend the "rule of law." In the end, Fox was able to keep the outrage and should be reversed, but its action resulted in a weakening of the institutional apparatus.
Finally, en el 2006 Fox mantuvo su empeño abierto por impedir el triunfo de una izquierda electoral. La energía que el gobierno no usó contra el narcotráfico, contra los grandes corruptos del pasado o para resolver otros males acumulados, la utilizó contra AMLO. Tan parcial fue su conducta que el propio Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación –una institución que también pecó de parcial-- se vio obligada a declarar que el presidente puso en peligro a la elección misma.
El fin justifica los medios.- Al final, Fox ganó y él mismo así lo admitió en un acto de rara sinceridad al declarar que entre sus logros estaba el haber ganado “dos elecciones”: la propia y la de su sucesor. Under the old regime was the architect of the "victory" for his successor but it was assumed that this is not the case in new condition. To the extent that Vicente Fox triumphed in 2000, helped open the doors of electoral democracy, but as he "won" the presidency to his successor, he revived one of the worst aspects of the old regime and contributed to erode confidence in a democracy which still needs consolidation.
By the end of The Prince, Machiavelli justifies the brutal of political ethics as old as humanity as the only way to get to Italy from his prostration and give the Italians a chance to live in peace and rebuilding the great nation it once was. In our case, what is the historical justification for Fox to be followed, perhaps without knowing it, the way suggested by Machiavelli?
Abstract .- Finally, in Mexico there was a change of party in power, but kept the spirit and design of the past. Http://diario.com.mx/nota.asp?notaid=3df153b35428bedd0d8a1cac6696eeae
Digital Journal 2003 ©
Office Data indicate that in Mexico City there are more than 17 000 narcotiendas or riding. Despite this, 6 thousand 428 people were arrested but only 345 (5 percent) were recorded before a judge. 
perform the functions of government. Collect our taxes and manage the resources of this state and we must all stand. Those who are civil servants and individuals. This can not be avoided except in the context of a civil war that I think nobody would want cause in Mexico. However, their legal title will not suffice, over six years, to give it legitimacy. It seems that not be repeated here 1988, when Carlos Salinas de Gortari might benefit from the complicity of the PAN, who covered him with the mantle that would give law and conceal the fraud and by which assumed the Presidency of the Republic.